Thank you for the peer review from Group C. It is a good suggestion to clearly display our project on the homepage of the official website, and I immediately made changes. We have already provided a lot of descriptions about the summary and explanation of the difficult parts of the course. For example, I mentioned the strengths and weaknesses of students majoring in history and music in this class. Of course, we have also added corresponding content in other sections. Due to the task requirement that learners can complete the course within one or two hours, I am unable to accept your suggestions such as group presentations, which will take a lot of time. And I can’t imagine how to efficiently complete a successful group presentation in such a short period of time. Likewise, adding one or two games in WordPress is a hard task. We are taking a EDCI course instead of a computer science course. It is not that necessary to spend a lot of time on achieving a seemingly impossible task.
As far as design for inclusion is concerned, you are right. Previously, our team had a different understanding on how the target audiences are specified. As I mentioned particularly, due to the high extent of expertise, this learning resource may not fit with any groups of learners. This is the reality. In order to align each other, I changed some wordings in my portion. For instance, the two groups are no longer music major students and history major students. Instead, the new groups, like Caitlyn understood in her portion, would be music major students, researchers, and educators.